Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy
BySylvie FodorWhat do Interpol, Lego, Microsoft Office, Pirate Bay, Viagra, Vuitton and Wikileaks have in common?
This question brought over 800 delegates from more than 100 countries to Paris last week at the invitation of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The conference was organised under the patronage of Nicolas Sarkozy, President of the French Republic. Other important personalities as well as major trade organisations such as the World Custom Organisation (WCO) or INTERPOL were represented.
The presence of high ranking personalities and world organisations undoubtlessly shows that the fight against infringement of intellectual property rights has become a top priority and a worldwide concern.
The US Immigration & Custom Enforcement (ICE) divides counterfeited good in four categories: Pharmaceutics, Health & Safety, Electronics, Movies & Music.
Under these circumstances, one may regret that this last aspect of IPR, Copyright, was under-represented at the conference.
In many instances counterfeited good are linked to international criminality. Consumer safety is therefore the main driver of anti-counterfeiting policies. This is obvious in the case of pharmaceutics or children toys. In these cases, counterfeiting and piracy may hurt or kill people. Even a pirated software may damage computers. In contrast, copyright infringement will neither damage a machine nor kill anybody.
But why would a Vuitton bag, let say, deserve more attention than a pirated film?
The reason may be that, in the case of copyrighted content, the pirates, too often, are the consumers themselves. They are not killing anybody, hurting themselves or damaging their computer. They are hurting the creator but don't feel this way. In fact, they feel they have a right to do so! When in February 2011, the ICE seized infringing websites, bloggers accused them of infringing the freedom of speech!
Wikileak and Pirates Bay: même combat!
Ignorance leads consumers to buy fake but dangerous medecines. In copyright, this is not just ignorance. Confusion is the rule. Although we may be experiencing an anti-copyright wave (unfortunately at WIPO too), support exists. (As published on this website, even private on-line companies, such as Google, have started to understand that content online is valuable.)
Awareness raising and consumer education, more time, are necessary.
Photos, videos and outcome statement of the Global Congress available here
Media aggregators - threat or opportunity? Industry insiders discuss
If, like me, you are overwhelmed by the amount of content published on the web - and often unsure of how important different trends are to our industry’s future - you may agree that we have an ever-increasing need for this content to be filtered by ‘trusted sources’. Read more
This blog collects funny and less funny stories of mishandled pictures. Read more
One day at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2013
Last Thursday, October 10th, I visited the Frankfurt Book Fair which brought over 200,000 book trade professionals to Germany. Read more
An Enthusiastic Intern to the Team “Behind the Scenes”
CEPIC is glad to welcome Neslihan Duygu Asiltürk, who will be working with the Cepic office team on making the Cepic Congress 2014 a big success. Read more
Google's monopoly from the Mapping point of view
The following questionable or illegal practices are part of my concerns about Google and a possible settlement. They are exemplary of how Google enters and dominates markets. Read more
Google Report on Piracy
Google just published a report entitled "How Google fights Piracy". Beyond the PR content expected from such a publication, the report allows a couple of interresting conclusions with regards to piracy online and digital content. Read more
Why did Rihanna succeed where Princess Diana, Elvis and Abba failed?
Robyn Rihanna Fenty v Topshop Rihanna’s success last week in her claim against Topshop came as a surprise. Mr Justice Birss (as he now is) was at pains to point out that there is no such thing in England as a free standing general right to control the reproduction of one’s image. Read more
Almunia heeds market and demands “better or improved proposals” from Google
Today’s news that Commissioner Almunia has rejected Google’s proposals will not come as a surprise to those who had analysed the offer, which clearly failed to address the core concerns identified by the Commission’s investigation. Read more
On 4 July, the European Commission held the mid term plenary session to summarize the results of the working groups of the stakeholder dialoge initiated last December and hand out bad or good marks. Read more
Good-bye Barcelona, hello Berlin
The lights turned off, the Internet stopped buzzing, the tables emptied, the Congress arrived at its end, good bye Barcelona. Read more